Here are my thoughts about the final two acts of this
clever and witty little play.
Up until this
point I was wondering the relevance of the title to the play. Pygmalion was an
old Greek myth about a creator falling in love with his creation. Reading the
first three acts, I assumed that Higgins will fall in love with Eliza and that
will be all. But I was thoroughly wrong and completely impressed and amazed at
how the events took a different turn.
The conflict of
the play is supposed to be whether Eliza becomes a lady or not. But apparently
that is not the case as the acts continue even after her success at some lavish
party. The play shows several conflicts such as, the differences of economic
classes, commercialism, the good and the evil of wealth, the idea of nobility
and freedom. The part of Eliza’s training and whether she is successful or not
is just a subplot to the play giving it more depth and helps it proceed.
The fourth act
begins with the trio entering Higgins’ lab after a tiresome evening party where
apparently Eliza performs a good work at presenting herself as a lady with her
impeccable speech and mannerism. But Higgins’ indifference to Eliza’s success
and calling her hard work a boring challenge is not only rude to Eliza but also
the audience because at this point, we grow fond of Eliza’s character and her
maturity. So Higgins’ inconsiderate attitude provokes our dislike towards him.
Shaw is clever in depicting what the audience feel through Eliza as she,
finally succumbing to her rage, throws slippers at his face, much to the
amusement and satisfaction of the audience.