Here is an example of argumentative essay where I speak against the given topic.
The topic is: We learn more at school than outside – Do you agree? Why?
Educational
institutions pose as a great place to gather and disperse knowledge but they
are not enough. A student who belongs to an educational institution, namely school,
attends the classes to learn undoubtedly. However, when it comes to
practicality, bookish knowledge is not self-sufficient. A person has to venture
beyond the realms of pages in order to gather a more fruitful lesson. We learn
more from the outside than schools mainly because schools are stricter, has
certain unnecessary boundaries and presence of authoritative figure which can
be intimidating.
Schools are definitely an important
source of knowledge but the mere existence of strict rules within the premise
can disrupt that process of learning. There is a high chance that the student
may get lost in all those rules and regulations and lose the primary focus
which is getting proper education. When the schools add trivial policies like
trimming hair up to a certain length for boys or compulsory braids for girls –
which has nothing to do with the intake of knowledge or discipline – they instill
unnecessary anxiety within the learners. This deviates them from actually
focusing on the education. All these rules take away the fun of gathering
knowledge.
Schools set a limitation on
interaction. Within the school area, the student has to follow rigid guidelines
that directs how a student has to interact with each other. It is an important
part of discipline no doubt, but in reality, the schools of this country are irrelevantly
strict. The schools are generally rigid when it comes to the interaction
between the students of opposite genders. For the existence of this kind of
boundaries, sharing and propagating ideas become tough. Outside of the school,
students do not have to follow all these extra set of rules and hence, interact
openly. This eliminates those boundaries, generates curiosity and helps to
share knowledge with each other.
Learning is quite dependent on the
student-teacher relationship. Since the teachers are the bridge between the
student and their textbooks, it is very important that the teacher is welcoming
enough. But often times, it has been observed that students feel intimidated by
the teachers no matter how friendly they are. This is not exactly the fault of
either the student or the teacher; rather, it is the fault of the ageism that
exists in our society. Nevertheless, schools are part of the society and this
kind of mentality hampers knowledge accumulation. The student begins to see
their teacher as an unquestionable authoritative figure. This is another reason
why the students feel more comfortable with their peers outside of the school
and this helps in the overall learning process.
Experience shows that learning is
more effective with peers in group studies than inside the formal setting of
the classroom. Schools have very limited time and rigid regulations which may interrupt
one’s path to gather knowledge. No such problems are found in the friend
circles and in those groups, no one acts as an intimidating authority figure.
Everyone is more or less equal. Hence, learning becomes much more effective and
enjoyable. Schools should either decrease their lesson time or arrange lesson
plans in such a way which will help the students spend more time with their
peers for the proper intake of education.
No comments:
Post a Comment